To this point the people "testifying" absolutely counts. All three of the people in this situation have been in the community for over three years, so obviously I trust their recalling of events more so than if some random was saying stuff. And we know he got banned by WJs as the screenshot by someone had the ban in the chat logs with a WJ stat right above it. To the other point I found the WJ perf method before (this was done late at night so the date reads 29th because it was after 12am, we didnt unban until the afternoon/evening of the 29th) unban. As for @nykaN saying he was unbanned without justification and same with skodnas countjump unban by Azaz (i think) those were before the current global team (at the very least Nykan was before me I have no idea when he got banned or unbanned, im pretty sure it was due to explointing tps though?). Conclusion: What @Chuckles said wasn't wrong and a lot of the misinterpretations are just simply due to poor word choices. Now I know why valve hates communication.
Obviously ieatcrayons and linus are friends, but i would not call persona and linus friends at all, also you can clearly see here in the jump before banned he landed a 301 wj
I would just like to say i was never contacted to give a formal written testimony, I retract any previous statement, I was not present at the scene of the crime, the claim that linus was wjing can not be verified, please reban, this is outrageous.
